Opportunity selection model
Source: David Rae, Entrepreneurship, published 2007 [PALGRAVE MACMILLAN] reproduced with permission of Palgrave MacMillan.
|
High-value Opportunity |
Market |
Low-value opportunity |
High-value opportunity |
Innovation |
Low-value opportunity |
|
|
Able to access market of growing size and value |
Market growth |
Limited growth potential in smaller markets |
Able to lead the market using prior experience |
Innovation leadership |
Learn as you go along to catch up |
|
|
Known, identifiable customers in defined market sector |
Customer base |
Limited or non-specific customer base |
Application solves a problem informed by customers’ needs |
Innovation related to customer needs |
Application does not solve customers’ real problem |
|
|
Customer reliance on product increasing over time |
Customer reliance and convergence |
Customer not reliant on product, divergent from their needs |
Differentiated technology; optimal performance and cost benefits |
Technology differentiation |
Undifferentiated technology; marginal performance and cost improvement |
|
|
Trust and open rela-tionships with clients; compatible practices |
Customer interaction |
Adversarial customer relation-ships; lack of fit |
Strong IP protection with clear ownership and control, hard to copy |
Intellectual property |
Weak or no IP protection – can be copied |
|
|
Long-term partner-ship within strong supplier and technology networks |
Partnering and networks |
One-off relation-ships within weak networks |
Opportunity to be first to market |
Speed to market |
Follower to market |
|
|
Unique advantages and strengths apparent in relation to competitors |
Competition |
Undifferentiated from competitors, forced to compete on price |
Implementation feasible; challenges can be overcome |
Feasibility of implementation |
Difficult to implement with many obstacles |
Opportunity selection model
|
High-value Opportunity |
Strategy |
Low-value opportunity |
High-value opportunity |
People |
Low-value opportunity |
|
|
Have a strategy to create and grow business |
Business growth |
Limited purpose and scope to build a business |
CEO shows leader-ship in innovation |
CEO leadership |
CEO not an innovative leader |
|
|
Multiple strategic and exit options |
Strategic options |
Single or limited exploitation options |
Management team skilled, compatible and motivated to achieve |
Management team effectiveness |
Team lack management skills fit and motivation |
|
|
High value creation from high profit margin and cash generation |
Value creation |
Low perceived value and profit margin |
Able to use prior experience and knowledge of industry |
Contextual experi-ence |
No pre-knowledge of industries or technology |
|
|
Superior business model |
Innovation business model |
No advantage over existing business models |
Able to recruit experienced people from within industry |
Staff capability |
Experienced and capable staff not available |
Opportunity selection model
|
High-value Opportunity |
Investment |
Low-value opportunity |
High-value opportunity |
Learning |
Low-value opportunity |
|
|
High return and profitability in rela-tion to investment |
Investment reward |
Low financial return for investment |
Independent control of business |
Independent control |
Not in full control of the business |
|
|
Attractive to potential investors with growing equity value |
Investor attraction |
Unattractive to investors offering limited increase in equity value |
Personal vision and confidence in busi-ness potential |
Personal vision |
Self doubt and lack of scope to succeed |
|
|
Acceptable risk of loss in worst case scenario |
Risk |
Unacceptably high downside risk |
Able to reduce margin between success and failure |
Incremental learning |
Unable to reduce margin of effectiveness |
|
|
Commercially viable with predictable break-even and cash flow |
Viability and cash flow |
Unpredictable cash flow, unlikely to achieve viability |
Intuition, knowing the right thing to do |
Intuition |
Does not feel right - bad past experience |
|
|
Long-term opportunity and income stream |
Timescale |
Short-term time-frame and rapid exit strategy |
Able to practise ethical framework and values |
Ethics |
Non-ethical exploitation |
Opportunity selection model
Scoring
| Market | Inovation |
| 6 factors total: |
6 factors total: |
| Strategy | People |
| 4 factors total: |
4 factors total: |
| Investment | Learning |
|
5 factors |
5 factors total: |
| 30 factors Total for all 6 clusters |
Score
| 0-7 | Likely to be a low-value opportunity with limited return, if all have aspects been explored suggest disregarding it. |
| 8-15 | Moderate-value opportunity, can aspects with growth potential be developed? |
| 16-24 | Worthwhile opportunity; needs careful analysis to improve weak areas and raise the value potential. |
| 25-30 | Strong potential for a high-value opportunity; beware of over-optimism. Explore in detail the weak areas, potential competition and feasibility; plan to implement |
Whatever the score, look carefully at the low-value clusters (scoring half or less) and explore how these could be increased.
Write the cluster score on the diagram overleaf:

Ways of increasing opportunity value:
Market
Innovation
Strategy
People
Investment
Learning